Homeworks academic writing service


The use of pathos in rajeev ravisankas article sweatshop oppression

February 5, 2018 at 9: Courtney Hayes February 4, 2018 at 8: He then goes on to explain how some of these poor college students go to the extreme of a black Friday sale in the wee hours of the morning. By doing this he is targeting his audience by referring to college students and how they feel.

Sweatshop Oppression Analysis

Always looking for the lowest prices anywhere they go. Ravisanker assumes his audience is all a poor college student or familiar with one.

However, I am a high school student reading this not a college student. Throughout the essay when using this term he assumes everyone knows what it means not giving a clear definition of the word.

His main purpose of the essay is to point out the actual reality of cheap things. Big manufacturing companies use people and put them in hard working places just to cut them off by making more money by cutting there way into it.

Kristina Vann February 4, 2018 at 10: The problem he identifies is not the actual buying of counterfeits but the ones who produce this counterfeits are crime syndicates who commit human tracking and child prostitution. His purpose in this essay is to inform and persuade of what the buying of counterfeits contribute too and to stop supporting those who commit crimes that endanger human lies.

In order to accomplish this purpose, he appeals mainly to logos and pathos. Then on page 104 he relates an experience of seeing child endangerment of kids in China enslavement to making this knock off luxury clothing.

How exactly did you draw the human tracking and child prostitution out of this piece? I understand the child abuse by using children in the sweatshops, but not the prostitution piece.

Maybe I totally missed something and I plan to go read this again to be sure. I believe that part of his purpose for the essay was to inform people of the cheap items and how they can be fake, but also on how they are created and how so many people to include college students buy these items. China is by far one of the worse countries for child labor and sweatshops.

It is a shame that companies feel that they have to go that route for their products.

A Rhetorical Analysis of Sweatshop Oppression

Ravisanker begins this essay and focuses on the poor college student. This is so relevant to all of us that are not working, and instead focusing on our degrees and education.

  1. By being mindful of where are products are being produced and who is making them. He refutes his argument by saying companies are the ones to blame, not the sweatshop opposers.
  2. By being mindful of where are products are being produced and who is making them.
  3. His purpose in this essay is to inform and persuade of what the buying of counterfeits contribute too and to stop supporting those who commit crimes that endanger human lies.

He refers to his audience many times, even with the mention of sales and even Black Friday. The typical poor college student is always looking for a deal, but I feel like that is most of us today, and not just a college student. Of course, Ravisanker focused on the college student and made that very clear. Ravisanker pulls his topic here with the sweatshops and how illegal they are and should be.

The cheaper prices most of the time come from places that are using the sweatshops to create the items. It is a horrible situation for these workers and he wants us to see that. These sweatshops consist of poor working conditions, hours and wages. This is where people are forced to work at times, it is not an option for all of them.

This is a sad situation that college students need to help fight against. Ravisanker lays out a very effective argument I feel like. He states many reasons why these sweatshops are wrong and provides the college student a reason to want to fight against them, They are really inhuman.

This is wrong to do to anyone of any age or nationality.

The use of pathos in rajeev ravisankas article sweatshop oppression

Companies should find some other way to lower prices rather than using a sweatshop to create their items. Cheap labor is not always the answer. This involves child abuse even in some ways. This author plays on ethos, pathos, and logos on his reasoning behind and within this essay. Making a pathos appeal to his audience by presenting himself as being in the same situation of trying to save money as much as possible as the papers intended audience.

Consumers and, seemingly, fellow college students of the mindset to have purchases they make be as cheap as possible wherever they are made. The author wants to create that emotional connection with the audiencewhich encourages the reader to keep reading.

Everyone not just college students are always looking for a good deal on anything.